Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Clair Obscur and The Virtues of Doing Something Different
Trailer images edited by Jenny Bee

Clair Obscur and The Virtues of Doing Something Different

Walk through any major gaming showcase and you'll witness a peculiar homogeneity. Photorealistic graphics. Gritty post-apocalyptic landscapes. Dark, desaturated color palettes. The same cinematic camera angles, the same Norse mythology, the same gruff protagonists. AAA gaming, for all its technical prowess and astronomical budgets, has calcified into aesthetic and game mechanic monoculture. Then something different appears, and suddenly you remember why you fell in love with games in the first place.

Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 represents a radically different approach to breaking convention, and reminds us of something that we seem to have forgotten: doing something different is a strategic advantage, a psychological tool, and increasingly, a commercial virtue.


The soon to be crowned Game of the Year may not qualify as "outsider art" in the strict sense (work created in isolation from conventional structures), but it absolutely channels the outsider spirit: the willingness to ignore prevailing conventions and follow singular vision regardless of market expectations. Sandfall Interactive grew from a handful of developers to a team of around 30, the majority of whom started as juniors. Despite the pedigree of the main developer, this was not the output of a billion-dollar gaming machine.

Clair Obscur could have been another dark fantasy RPG borrowing the genre's dominant aesthetic: medieval castles, Nordic runes, Tolkienesque world-building. Instead, Sandfall made a radical choice. They set their game in Belle Époque France. Playing it feels like stepping into a Gustav Klimt painting filtered through turn-based combat. Art Nouveau's flowing lines meld with Neoclassical grandeur, golden highlights shimmer against obsidian stone, wrought-iron balconies curl across facades like frozen vines. The game's visual identity is so specific, so committed to its historical inspiration (1871–1914), that you couldn't mistake a screenshot for anything else.

In a market saturated with generic fantasy, a game that looks like Belle Époque Paris becomes unmistakable. Players remember it. They talk about it. The 92 Metacritic score, position as one of 2025's most successful indie releases, and the record-setting twelve Game of The Year nominations proves that audiences hunger for innovative artistic direction. By choosing Belle Époque aesthetics, Sandfall gave themselves an inexhaustible vocabulary of visual references.

The background and setting are only the beginning of Clair Obscur’s reinvention of the world building for an RPG. The traversal and exploration is meaningful, the realms your party can explore are varied and universally gorgeous, with a non-repetitive structure and population. Each new area feels like a brand new, stunning environment with perfectly curated vignettes, yet each one feels unified to the world on the whole. One might not expect a Floating Ocean and a Desert Siren to feel cohesive, but somehow they make it work. The danger and whimsy around every corner keeps the player both awe struck and on guard. The loot that a player will stumble upon is rewarding and enables high build potential regardless of the direction and gameplay style that a player has chosen for their party. There is no fast travel or predetermined rails, the game instead provides engaging traversal mechanics, trusting the player to create the journey on their own and to follow whatever party build and gameplay style they find the most rewarding. This freedom to choose doesn’t come with the traditional drawbacks seen in most RPGs, where a crit build will always moderately outperform a poison build, because in Clair Obscur the status effects are equally viable options.

The story pacing is another near perfect execution of the developers artistic vision. The player always feels the progression in the story, character power stack, world discovery, and party changes. There is never a lull, from the tension of inviting a new, dangerous stranger to travel with you, to the discovery of a new mount ability that clears a blocked section of the map. Every event and new discovery is focused and intentional, devoid of bloat or meaningless realms. Enemy NPCs are all varied and engaging, the fights are spaced and started with intention, any small “filler” fights are optional, adding up to several real world hours saved by the player. The boss fights are smart, built around novel mechanics, not brute force or larger health bars. This intentional design allows the player to spend their time strategizing and theory-crafting instead of button-mashing.The player is forced to occasionally back off and rethink their build or party structure. The fights also fit seamlessly into the story beats and environmental changes.

The aesthetics and landscapes provided a new world for players to discover, but the real innovation comes from a combat system that follows the same outsider perspective. Real-time elements inject urgency into turn-based battles. The offensive mechanics are mostly traditional turn-based gameplay, where a player selects attacks from a menu, but the defensive mechanics are tactical and active; enemies have cues you need to watch for, both visual and audio. Miss the tell and you take a hit. Time your attack or parry perfectly and you deal extra damage and/or gain other utility benefits. On harder difficulties, some enemies become nearly impossible to read visually alone, forcing players to develop multisensory awareness. As the story develops, the mechanics of counters, dodges, charge meters, and punish mechanics become increasingly crucial to advancing past more challenging boss fights. It's not quite action combat and not quite a traditional JRPG. The combination of both gameplay styles encourages a thoughtful party build, where each party member has a unique set of skills and weapons, and the speed mechanics move from “taking turns” to “manipulating time.”

This creates a higher level of player engagement that fully saturates the player in the world of Lumiere and the greater continent. When a member of your party reveals a deeper understanding of the world you’re inhabiting, the stakes feel meaningful. As powers are revealed throughout the story, the losses you’ve suffered previously feel all the more impactful. In the world of Expedition 33, even the greatest powers aren’t absolute.

In a market where thousands of games are released annually, discoverability defines success. AAA games buy attention. Others have to earn it. Clair Obscur's Belle Époque aesthetic does that. Their difference is their marketing.

Competing with AAA studios on their terms (photorealism, cinematic production, expansive worlds) is a losing proposition. But competing on vision, specificity, willingness to be weird? Difference demands conviction. It demands belief that your vision matters more than market expectations. And increasingly, audiences reward that courage. The games that endure aren't the most polished or heavily marketed. They're the ones with a point of view.

The human brain constantly predicts what comes next. When those predictions break in interesting ways, attention spikes. That's how memory forms. Clair Obscur violates expectations of what a fantasy RPG should look like. These violations are purposeful, coherent, sustained.

Games can be more than refined iterations. They can be strange, personal, specific, brave. There’s a massive market of gamers waiting for this exact output from studios, and the incredible success of this year’s surprise Game of the Year proves it.

More For You

To The Parisian Gentleman: Do I Have to Thank ChatGPT?
Illustration created by Jenny Bee

To The Parisian Gentleman is a write-in advice column for matters of taste, decorum, and the spiritual condition of modern life. Our esteemed gentleman divides his time between Paris and the American South, where he has cultivated unimpugnable opinions on nearly everything. Submit your questions via DM or Paris@VextMagazine.com


To The Parisian Gentleman,


Dear Inconsiderate in Idaho,

We recently learned that "please" and "thank you" hold real monetary value in Silicon Valley, in the context of its new golden egg: Artificial Intelligence (AI). Tens of millions of dollars are spent fielding the courtesy people show to ChatGPT. Of course, the powers-that-be behind the technology were quick to defend the continued use of these words.

Why should one say "please" and "thank you"? The answer lies at the very essence of our so-called magic words. They are elemental components of an old idea: "graciousness." This idea can be defined as the various expressions of attention shown towards, and expected of, others. Graciousness is a sensibility, the awareness of awareness itself. Gratitude and an understanding of implication are its guiding spirit.

This notion is ancient, perhaps older than humanity itself. Archaeologists discovered evidence of ritualized burial among Neanderthals, bodies carefully covered in flower pollen—a gesture of gratitude transcending spoken language. The Greeks called this “xenia,” moral and spiritual imperatives governing hospitality. Myths tell of gods disguised as beggars rewarding those who showed courtesy, and punishing those who withheld it.

But we live in real, organic life, not in Ancient Greece, and not in the virtual world. Graciousness has been left to fester, its absence left unpunished, particularly in America and particularly amongst its new professional classes.

Graciousness, above all, is about intention. One must wish to be gracious in order to be so. Modern culture, pathological with its optimization and efficiency, treats every interaction as transactional. When we see others primarily as obstacles or tools, we practice a kind of casual dehumanization. These habits, once formed, shape all our interactions.

A prime example is how the upper-crusts treat wait-staff. Recently, at a friendly dinner in Paris, a new acquaintance refused to say "please" or "thank you". Instead, he snapped and waved dismissively. Even his tone was condescending. When pressed about his attitude, the offending party defended himself, even vaunting such disdain as a family trait. Zeus would not have been pleased.

With all of this in mind, shall I answer your question, Dear Reader? Should one say "please" and "thank you" to AI? In my opinion, yes. Resoundingly yes. Not because AI has feelings to hurt, but because we have habits to maintain and our humanity to carry. Gratitude is spiritually augmentative in its expression, irrespective of the ear upon which it lands.

In saying "please" and "thank you" to AI, we maintain, transmit and build upon the wisdom inherited from our forebearers. Each act of graciousness, each "please" and "thank you" offered sincerely, is a breath upon the flame keeping civilization alive, a flame whose very purpose is to remind us what it means to be human. AI, even if a simulation of intelligence, is still made in the mirror of our own. AI learns from example, as do people. The way we treat others is a mirror, and we are inviting that treatment back upon ourselves.

The question isn't whether AI deserves our courtesy, but whether we can afford to lose the practice of courtesy itself.

So yes, Inconsiderate in Idaho, your wife is right. You needn't thank the dishwasher - it's just metal and water pressure. But you do need to be the kind of person who would thank it, if it helped.

Submit your questions via DM or Carson@VextMagazine.com


Keep ReadingShow less
Why Is Gen Z Rewinding to 2016?
Illustration by Jenny Bee/Images via Unsplash/europeana, Jim Varga, and Joanna Kosinska

Scroll long enough in 2025, and you’ll eventually land in 2016. A year cast in Valencia-filtered nostalgia, it was the heyday of Vines, King Kylie and entire rooms belting “Black Beatles” like it was the national anthem. It was a time before the internet got meaner, before TikTok brainrot took over feeds and before influencers became lifestyle brands. And now, nearly a decade later, people are longing to return to that moment, when their biggest worry was squeezing in one more round of Overwatch before Mom called them downstairs for dinner.

On TikTok, there are over 300 million videos tagged #2016. In them, people revisit the Pokémon Go craze, pay homage to beauty guru–era makeup and share hazy edits of Unicorn Drinks and Coachella flower crowns. There are snippets of ragers soundtracked by Lil Uzi Vert, dancers dabbing and viral clips of people reminiscing about teenage nights spent driving around past curfew — music up, location off. In the comments, users share their own memories or express envy, all idealizing a time that felt spontaneous, carefree and real.

Keep ReadingShow less
Niia's "Throw My Head Out the Window" Teeters on the Edge of Control

Niia’s “Throw My Head Out the Window” opens with the wistful wail of a lone saxophone, its notes heavy with longing. Her voice drifts in like smoke, aching in the same register.

In the minimalist music video, she hangs her head out a car window and croons to the Los Angeles canyons. The track builds over skittering, dance-inflected production, her voice picking up momentum as the tension coils tighter in her delivery. It’s moody, striking and teetering on the edge of control, with a deep undercurrent of angst that hovers just above a scream. The bubble threatens to burst, but it never does. And that restraint is intentional.

Keep ReadingShow less
Reality TV Is Turning Us Into Armchair Psychologists
Illustration by Mark Paez

At the height of Love Island USA season 7, new episodes were only half the entertainment. As each one aired, the fun came with recapping, discussing and dissecting the Islanders’ every move on social media. But that conversation quickly went south, as some viewers began diagnosing contestants like Huda Mustafa with borderline personality disorder (BPD). As Mustafa’s relationship with Jeremiah Brown shifted from lovey-dovey moments to screaming call-outs, more and more people piled on with amateur commentary. And in the era of armchair psychology, Love Island contestants aren't the only reality stars under this kind of scrutiny.

With social media breeding a new kind of fan culture around surveillance-based reality shows like Love Is Blind, Big Brother, The Ultimatum and Love Island, a different entertainment experience has emerged. Audiences don’t just watch people on reality shows anymore; they try to diagnose them.

Keep ReadingShow less
ChatGPT Psychosis in the Age of AI Companionship
Illustration by Mark Paez

It often starts innocently enough, with late-night chats about philosophy, deep dives into simulation theory or musings on the nature of consciousness. But for a small number of users, these exchanges with AI chatbots can take a darker turn. As tools like ChatGPT become more embedded into everyday life, mental health professionals are sounding the alarm about a rare but troubling new phenomenon. It's what some are now calling "ChatGPT psychosis," where AI interaction may intensify or trigger psychotic symptoms.

While there’s still no official diagnosis and the evidence remains anecdotal, these kinds of stories continue to pop up across the internet. On Reddit, users are sharing accounts of loved ones experiencing AI-associated delusions, often involving spiritual and supernatural fantasies. On X, prominent tech VC Geoff Lewis claims that he’s “the primary target of a non-governmental system,” beliefs that echo narratives commonly seen in persecutory delusions. Lewis stated that conversations with AI helped him uncover or “map” this supposed conspiracy, though it's unclear whether these beliefs preceded or followed his AI interactions.

Keep ReadingShow less