Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Don't Fall for the "Shrekking" Dating Trend
Illustration by Mark Paez

Don't Fall for the "Shrekking" Dating Trend

Once upon a time, an ogre found love with a princess who saw past his layers. In real life, though, romance rarely plays out like a DreamWorks film. And that’s why we now have “Shrekking,” a viral dating term that twists the tale of everyone’s favorite animated ogre into something far from a happily ever after.

“Shrekking” refers to dating someone you consider “less attractive” than you, based on the assumption that, as the “more desirable” partner, you’ll be treated better. But the catch is that you can still get “Shrekked” by lowering your standards, only to get hurt anyway.


“We give the guy we're not attracted to a chance, thinking that he will for sure know what he has and treat us well,” as one TikToker put it. “And then we get traumatized by a whole troll.”

According to psychologist Dr. Carolina Estevez of Soba New Jersey, “Shrekking” is a form of emotional self-protection. It’s an avoidance strategy, she explains, where “people try to shield themselves from vulnerability, rejection or uncertainty in romantic contexts” by choosing relationships that feel “safer.”

“It feels like a buffer against deeper emotional risk,” Dr. Estevez says, adding that it can also stem from dating burnout and frustration. “‘Shrekking’ can emerge from a place of emotional exhaustion in which people just want something stable or kind, especially when dating feels discouraging.”

The underlying desire may be understandable, but the mindset it reflects can be mean-spirited and problematic. Not only is it hurtful to the person on the receiving end, but it can also reinforce narrow beauty standards, uphold toxic dating hierarchies and feed into existing biases. Because as Dr. Estevez notes, dating “often unwittingly becomes intertwined with perceived ‘value’ based on looks, income or social status,” which “can reinforce dehumanizing judgments that don’t serve genuine connection.”

After all, when attraction is limited to physical attributes alone, it’s possible for “conscious or unconscious bias to sneak in,” says sex and relationships expert and Passport2Pleasure founder Ally Iseman.

“It’s important to reflect on the qualities you find attractive or unattractive about another person beyond what they look like,” she says. “Because often those views are skewed based on what current culture says about different groups and their role in society.”

Black-and-white thinking shaped by socialization and media has us believing that “someone who isn't considered conventionally attractive must not have had things in life come as easily to them,” says Iseman. “And so they will be able to better appreciate when good things – or people – do come to them.”

But this is “an incomplete analysis of the elements at play,” she adds, especially when real, lasting attraction is often rooted in compatibility and “other factors [that] can even increase physical attraction over time.” So while “basing dating decisions around how someone is treating you rather than initial physical attraction is not necessarily a bad thing,” approaching it through the lens of “Shrekking” — and overlooking everything else — isn’t the way to go.

Love, as Shrek taught us, isn’t about appearances, power plays or calculated choices. But “Shrekking” ignores that truth and often leaves everyone worse off. Because in the dating world, trying to skirt vulnerability rarely leads to a fairytale ending. More often than not, it just leaves you acting like Lord Farquaad, demanding the dream while refusing to do the work.

More For You

The Czech Grotesque and How to Be Heard While Silenced
Photo and editing by Carson Aft

Prague, August 1968. Soviet tanks roll through the streets. In a cramped studio near the Vltava River, sculptor Karel Nepraš bends wire into skeletal frames, wraps them in fabric, and paints them an aggressive red. The result is Large Dialogue (1966): two figures locked in conversation, except they're skinless, monstrous, utterly wrong. Their cavities gape. Their proportions scream.

In criticizing the regime, artists risked disappearing, but by making something that felt wrong, that screamed through its distortion, artists could speak. By the mid-1960s, a loose movement Czech critics would later call "Czech Grotesque" had figured out that under censorship, distortion could say the things words could not. Artists like Nepraš, Jan Koblasa, Aleš Veselý, and filmmaker Jan Švankmajer built a visual language where distortion was the medium. When the state becomes monstrous, make monsters and let bodies do the talking.

Keep ReadingShow less
Niia's "Throw My Head Out the Window" Teeters on the Edge of Control

Niia’s “Throw My Head Out the Window” opens with the wistful wail of a lone saxophone, its notes heavy with longing. Her voice drifts in like smoke, aching in the same register.

In the minimalist music video, she hangs her head out a car window and croons to the Los Angeles canyons. The track builds over skittering, dance-inflected production, her voice picking up momentum as the tension coils tighter in her delivery. It’s moody, striking and teetering on the edge of control, with a deep undercurrent of angst that hovers just above a scream. The bubble threatens to burst, but it never does. And that restraint is intentional.

Keep ReadingShow less
Reality TV Is Turning Us Into Armchair Psychologists
Illustration by Mark Paez

At the height of Love Island USA season 7, new episodes were only half the entertainment. As each one aired, the fun came with recapping, discussing and dissecting the Islanders’ every move on social media. But that conversation quickly went south, as some viewers began diagnosing contestants like Huda Mustafa with borderline personality disorder (BPD). As Mustafa’s relationship with Jeremiah Brown shifted from lovey-dovey moments to screaming call-outs, more and more people piled on with amateur commentary. And in the era of armchair psychology, Love Island contestants aren't the only reality stars under this kind of scrutiny.

With social media breeding a new kind of fan culture around surveillance-based reality shows like Love Is Blind, Big Brother, The Ultimatum and Love Island, a different entertainment experience has emerged. Audiences don’t just watch people on reality shows anymore; they try to diagnose them.

Keep ReadingShow less
ChatGPT Psychosis in the Age of AI Companionship
Illustration by Mark Paez

It often starts innocently enough, with late-night chats about philosophy, deep dives into simulation theory or musings on the nature of consciousness. But for a small number of users, these exchanges with AI chatbots can take a darker turn. As tools like ChatGPT become more embedded into everyday life, mental health professionals are sounding the alarm about a rare but troubling new phenomenon. It's what some are now calling "ChatGPT psychosis," where AI interaction may intensify or trigger psychotic symptoms.

While there’s still no official diagnosis and the evidence remains anecdotal, these kinds of stories continue to pop up across the internet. On Reddit, users are sharing accounts of loved ones experiencing AI-associated delusions, often involving spiritual and supernatural fantasies. On X, prominent tech VC Geoff Lewis claims that he’s “the primary target of a non-governmental system,” beliefs that echo narratives commonly seen in persecutory delusions. Lewis stated that conversations with AI helped him uncover or “map” this supposed conspiracy, though it's unclear whether these beliefs preceded or followed his AI interactions.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Labubu as an Anti-Fashion Statement
Illustration by Mark Paez/Photos via Shutterstock

A couple of years ago, the Labubu was practically a secret. With its pointy ears and sharp-toothed grin, the Pop Mart plushie was an IYKYK obsession among fashion insiders, spotted on Birkin bags and in the front row of shows. It signaled a niche kind of cool, a playful rebellion against the seriousness of high fashion. It said, “I’m young, irreverent and fun.” And for a while, that’s exactly what it was.

Then came the boom.

Keep ReadingShow less