Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

The Labubu as an Anti-Fashion Statement
Illustration by Mark Paez/Photos via Shutterstock

The Labubu as an Anti-Fashion Statement

A couple of years ago, the Labubu was practically a secret. With its pointy ears and sharp-toothed grin, the Pop Mart plushie was an IYKYK obsession among fashion insiders, spotted on Birkin bags and in the front row of shows. It signaled a niche kind of cool, a playful rebellion against the seriousness of high fashion. It said, “I’m young, irreverent and fun.” And for a while, that’s exactly what it was.

Then came the boom.


Fueled by celebrity sightings and a deluge of TikTok unboxings, the impish toy went from cult favorite to global craze in just a few months. Suddenly, everyone and their mother had a Labubu and, in the eyes of fashion’s inner circle, it began to lose its sartorial value. But as some start to call these popular plushies overrated and passé, fashion experts say something interesting is happening: the Labubu is now evolving into the latest anti-fashion accessory.

Anti-fashion takes what’s typically considered “uncool” and reframes it as something stylish. Often rooted in counterculture, it serves as a critique of wider trends, like grunge’s embrace of “ordinary” clothes as a rejection of mall culture, normcore’s bland basics and the rise of intentionally “ugly fashion.” It’s dad sneakers and Crocs. MSCHF’s Big Red Boots and Loewe’s balloon shoes. And now, there’s the Labubu, an aesthetically over-the-top object that's slowly losing traction, while gaining new meaning among anti-fashionistas.

“It has come to symbolize overconsumption and the vulgarity of trends,” author and fashion historian Robert Ossant says. “In an ironic sense, it can now be embraced as an object of fashion critique and a contemporary anti-trend.”

Much of this stems from “oversaturation” and exposure fatigue, according to celebrity stylist Amanda Massi, who says we're "creeping up" on the end of the craze and entering the Labubu's anti-fashion era. Because for some, it can now be viewed as a vehicle for self-expression and rebellion, rather than a straight-up trend.

“It’s a counterculture object that’s a kind of ‘fuck you’ to mainstream culture, and the cohort of people who’ve suddenly deemed them ‘tacky’” as Ossant puts it.

After all, Labubus look like something straight out of Where the Wild Things Are, and their appeal lies in their visual contradiction: grotesque yet cuddly, quirky yet mass-produced, cute but confrontational. These colorful, kitschy, and kooky collectibles are hard to ignore, especially as bag charms or belt clip-ons, dressed in custom outfits or given unexpected makeovers. Even nude, they’re an attention-grabbing way to express personality while declaring, “I like these, regardless of what you or anyone else thinks.”

Not every Labubu carries the weight of a complex cultural critique. Sometimes, it just “comes down to personal style,” says Massi. But there’s also something to be said about how they can be used to distance oneself from others, with Massi adding that, “You can be like, ‘Oh, I still like it. I don’t really care if it’s on trend or not. It just represents me and my outfit.’”

For young people in particular, the appeal of anti-fashion lies in rejecting a world where Instagrammable perfection is currently fueling minimal, hyper-curated looks, like workplace basics, neutral palettes and clean girl makeup. But with “its wild eyes and goblin face,” Ossant says, the Labubu pushes back against “the polish of clean girl aesthetics and the muted restraints of office dressing,” all while making a statement about individual expression.

“Gen Z are coming into their own, and much of that is about taking up space and being visible,” as Ossant says. “It means wearing the colorful thing, wearing the strange thing, dressing in big-fitting clothing.”

For some, this also positions the Labubu as a symbol of ironic consumption. They're a ready-made paradox, where buying mass-market signals that you're above the mass market. The irony is not in what is bought but in how it is worn, with a knowing wink that says, “Yes, I participated, but I am smart enough to know there's a deeper meaning.” As Ossant puts it, the Labubu is "in on the joke and simultaneously the butt of a joke," critiquing “the worst excess of fashion, influencer culture and the trend cycle.” But it’s also critique made convenient, a way to buy into a trend while opting out of its sincerity.

It’s a way to thumb your nose at those who look down on the Labubu, to laugh at widespread discourse that positions it as a symbol of Gen Z’s “mindless consumerism.” Wearing one is becoming a way to show that, as Ossant puts it, “millennials, brands and media outlets didn’t quite get it.”

“It signals a generational shift,” he says. “Gen Z often uses fashion to create distance, to mock, subvert… and resist sincerity.”

The Labubu's ultimate trick, then, is letting you flaunt its absurdity while still wearing it, reclaiming the overdone and ostentatious. It’s not just an accessory. It’s a punchline, a protest and a declaration of ironic autonomy. A goblin-like loophole in the fashion system that lets you play the game, but on your own terms.

More For You

To The Parisian Gentleman: Do I Have to Thank ChatGPT?
Illustration created by Jenny Bee

To The Parisian Gentleman is a write-in advice column for matters of taste, decorum, and the spiritual condition of modern life. Our esteemed gentleman divides his time between Paris and the American South, where he has cultivated unimpugnable opinions on nearly everything. Submit your questions via DM or Paris@VextMagazine.com


To The Parisian Gentleman,


Dear Inconsiderate in Idaho,

We recently learned that "please" and "thank you" hold real monetary value in Silicon Valley, in the context of its new golden egg: Artificial Intelligence (AI). Tens of millions of dollars are spent fielding the courtesy people show to ChatGPT. Of course, the powers-that-be behind the technology were quick to defend the continued use of these words.

Why should one say "please" and "thank you"? The answer lies at the very essence of our so-called magic words. They are elemental components of an old idea: "graciousness." This idea can be defined as the various expressions of attention shown towards, and expected of, others. Graciousness is a sensibility, the awareness of awareness itself. Gratitude and an understanding of implication are its guiding spirit.

This notion is ancient, perhaps older than humanity itself. Archaeologists discovered evidence of ritualized burial among Neanderthals, bodies carefully covered in flower pollen—a gesture of gratitude transcending spoken language. The Greeks called this “xenia,” moral and spiritual imperatives governing hospitality. Myths tell of gods disguised as beggars rewarding those who showed courtesy, and punishing those who withheld it.

But we live in real, organic life, not in Ancient Greece, and not in the virtual world. Graciousness has been left to fester, its absence left unpunished, particularly in America and particularly amongst its new professional classes.

Graciousness, above all, is about intention. One must wish to be gracious in order to be so. Modern culture, pathological with its optimization and efficiency, treats every interaction as transactional. When we see others primarily as obstacles or tools, we practice a kind of casual dehumanization. These habits, once formed, shape all our interactions.

A prime example is how the upper-crusts treat wait-staff. Recently, at a friendly dinner in Paris, a new acquaintance refused to say "please" or "thank you". Instead, he snapped and waved dismissively. Even his tone was condescending. When pressed about his attitude, the offending party defended himself, even vaunting such disdain as a family trait. Zeus would not have been pleased.

With all of this in mind, shall I answer your question, Dear Reader? Should one say "please" and "thank you" to AI? In my opinion, yes. Resoundingly yes. Not because AI has feelings to hurt, but because we have habits to maintain and our humanity to carry. Gratitude is spiritually augmentative in its expression, irrespective of the ear upon which it lands.

In saying "please" and "thank you" to AI, we maintain, transmit and build upon the wisdom inherited from our forebearers. Each act of graciousness, each "please" and "thank you" offered sincerely, is a breath upon the flame keeping civilization alive, a flame whose very purpose is to remind us what it means to be human. AI, even if a simulation of intelligence, is still made in the mirror of our own. AI learns from example, as do people. The way we treat others is a mirror, and we are inviting that treatment back upon ourselves.

The question isn't whether AI deserves our courtesy, but whether we can afford to lose the practice of courtesy itself.

So yes, Inconsiderate in Idaho, your wife is right. You needn't thank the dishwasher - it's just metal and water pressure. But you do need to be the kind of person who would thank it, if it helped.

Submit your questions via DM or Carson@VextMagazine.com


Keep ReadingShow less
The Rise of D.I.Y. Botox and Fillers
Photo via Shutterstock/AtlasStudio

It’s a quiet Friday night, and Kirstin is busy setting up her injection station. Laid out on a tray for easy access, she places an alcohol wipe and a tube of lidocaine cream next to a box containing a small syringe of cosmetic dermal filler. She takes another look in the mirror and studies her face while testing out the plunger, doing a few tiny passes onto the tray before placing the needle to her lips. “It is a bit nerve-wracking, of course,” the 24-year-old says while detailing her first-time experience. “But overall, I’m thrilled with my results.”

Kirstin isn’t a doctor or a nurse, but she is part of a growing number of people doing at-home cosmetic injectables. Through social media, they teach each other how to perform procedures typically done in doctors’ offices and licensed medical spas. They swap tips, share product recommendations and talk about their own experiences. They ask ChatGPT for advice and discuss Trump’s tariffs affecting the cost of South Korean imports. And with the help of facial anatomy charts, fake practice lips and YouTube demonstrations, they fill, aspirate and inject before posting their results online.

Keep ReadingShow less
Niia's "Throw My Head Out the Window" Teeters on the Edge of Control

Niia’s “Throw My Head Out the Window” opens with the wistful wail of a lone saxophone, its notes heavy with longing. Her voice drifts in like smoke, aching in the same register.

In the minimalist music video, she hangs her head out a car window and croons to the Los Angeles canyons. The track builds over skittering, dance-inflected production, her voice picking up momentum as the tension coils tighter in her delivery. It’s moody, striking and teetering on the edge of control, with a deep undercurrent of angst that hovers just above a scream. The bubble threatens to burst, but it never does. And that restraint is intentional.

Keep ReadingShow less
Reality TV Is Turning Us Into Armchair Psychologists
Illustration by Mark Paez

At the height of Love Island USA season 7, new episodes were only half the entertainment. As each one aired, the fun came with recapping, discussing and dissecting the Islanders’ every move on social media. But that conversation quickly went south, as some viewers began diagnosing contestants like Huda Mustafa with borderline personality disorder (BPD). As Mustafa’s relationship with Jeremiah Brown shifted from lovey-dovey moments to screaming call-outs, more and more people piled on with amateur commentary. And in the era of armchair psychology, Love Island contestants aren't the only reality stars under this kind of scrutiny.

With social media breeding a new kind of fan culture around surveillance-based reality shows like Love Is Blind, Big Brother, The Ultimatum and Love Island, a different entertainment experience has emerged. Audiences don’t just watch people on reality shows anymore; they try to diagnose them.

Keep ReadingShow less
ChatGPT Psychosis in the Age of AI Companionship
Illustration by Mark Paez

It often starts innocently enough, with late-night chats about philosophy, deep dives into simulation theory or musings on the nature of consciousness. But for a small number of users, these exchanges with AI chatbots can take a darker turn. As tools like ChatGPT become more embedded into everyday life, mental health professionals are sounding the alarm about a rare but troubling new phenomenon. It's what some are now calling "ChatGPT psychosis," where AI interaction may intensify or trigger psychotic symptoms.

While there’s still no official diagnosis and the evidence remains anecdotal, these kinds of stories continue to pop up across the internet. On Reddit, users are sharing accounts of loved ones experiencing AI-associated delusions, often involving spiritual and supernatural fantasies. On X, prominent tech VC Geoff Lewis claims that he’s “the primary target of a non-governmental system,” beliefs that echo narratives commonly seen in persecutory delusions. Lewis stated that conversations with AI helped him uncover or “map” this supposed conspiracy, though it's unclear whether these beliefs preceded or followed his AI interactions.

Keep ReadingShow less