Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

To The Parisian Gentleman: Do I Have to Thank ChatGPT?
Illustration created by Jenny Bee

To The Parisian Gentleman: Do I Have to Thank ChatGPT?


To The Parisian Gentleman is a write-in advice column for matters of taste, decorum, and the spiritual condition of modern life. Our esteemed gentleman divides his time between Paris and the American South, where he has cultivated unimpugnable opinions on nearly everything. Submit your questions via DM or Paris@VextMagazine.com


To The Parisian Gentleman,


My wife insists I be nice to ChatGPT, but it's not even real or sentient. Please tell me I don't have to start saying "thank you" to the dishwasher or laundry machine either.

-Inconsiderate in Idaho


Dear Inconsiderate in Idaho,

We recently learned that "please" and "thank you" hold real monetary value in Silicon Valley, in the context of its new golden egg: Artificial Intelligence (AI). Tens of millions of dollars are spent fielding the courtesy people show to ChatGPT. Of course, the powers-that-be behind the technology were quick to defend the continued use of these words.

Why should one say "please" and "thank you"? The answer lies at the very essence of our so-called magic words. They are elemental components of an old idea: "graciousness." This idea can be defined as the various expressions of attention shown towards, and expected of, others. Graciousness is a sensibility, the awareness of awareness itself. Gratitude and an understanding of implication are its guiding spirit.

This notion is ancient, perhaps older than humanity itself. Archaeologists discovered evidence of ritualized burial among Neanderthals, bodies carefully covered in flower pollen—a gesture of gratitude transcending spoken language. The Greeks called this “xenia,” moral and spiritual imperatives governing hospitality. Myths tell of gods disguised as beggars rewarding those who showed courtesy, and punishing those who withheld it.

But we live in real, organic life, not in Ancient Greece, and not in the virtual world. Graciousness has been left to fester, its absence left unpunished, particularly in America and particularly amongst its new professional classes.

Graciousness, above all, is about intention. One must wish to be gracious in order to be so. Modern culture, pathological with its optimization and efficiency, treats every interaction as transactional. When we see others primarily as obstacles or tools, we practice a kind of casual dehumanization. These habits, once formed, shape all our interactions.

A prime example is how the upper-crusts treat wait-staff. Recently, at a friendly dinner in Paris, a new acquaintance refused to say "please" or "thank you". Instead, he snapped and waved dismissively. Even his tone was condescending. When pressed about his attitude, the offending party defended himself, even vaunting such disdain as a family trait. Zeus would not have been pleased.

With all of this in mind, shall I answer your question, Dear Reader? Should one say "please" and "thank you" to AI? In my opinion, yes. Resoundingly yes. Not because AI has feelings to hurt, but because we have habits to maintain and our humanity to carry. Gratitude is spiritually augmentative in its expression, irrespective of the ear upon which it lands.

In saying "please" and "thank you" to AI, we maintain, transmit and build upon the wisdom inherited from our forebearers. Each act of graciousness, each "please" and "thank you" offered sincerely, is a breath upon the flame keeping civilization alive, a flame whose very purpose is to remind us what it means to be human. AI, even if a simulation of intelligence, is still made in the mirror of our own. AI learns from example, as do people. The way we treat others is a mirror, and we are inviting that treatment back upon ourselves.

The question isn't whether AI deserves our courtesy, but whether we can afford to lose the practice of courtesy itself.

So yes, Inconsiderate in Idaho, your wife is right. You needn't thank the dishwasher - it's just metal and water pressure. But you do need to be the kind of person who would thank it, if it helped.

Submit your questions via DM or Carson@VextMagazine.com


More For You

The Czech Grotesque and How to Be Heard While Silenced
Photo and editing by Carson Aft

Prague, August 1968. Soviet tanks roll through the streets. In a cramped studio near the Vltava River, sculptor Karel Nepraš bends wire into skeletal frames, wraps them in fabric, and paints them an aggressive red. The result is Large Dialogue (1966): two figures locked in conversation, except they're skinless, monstrous, utterly wrong. Their cavities gape. Their proportions scream.

In criticizing the regime, artists risked disappearing, but by making something that felt wrong, that screamed through its distortion, artists could speak. By the mid-1960s, a loose movement Czech critics would later call "Czech Grotesque" had figured out that under censorship, distortion could say the things words could not. Artists like Nepraš, Jan Koblasa, Aleš Veselý, and filmmaker Jan Švankmajer built a visual language where distortion was the medium. When the state becomes monstrous, make monsters and let bodies do the talking.

Keep ReadingShow less
Niia's "Throw My Head Out the Window" Teeters on the Edge of Control

Niia’s “Throw My Head Out the Window” opens with the wistful wail of a lone saxophone, its notes heavy with longing. Her voice drifts in like smoke, aching in the same register.

In the minimalist music video, she hangs her head out a car window and croons to the Los Angeles canyons. The track builds over skittering, dance-inflected production, her voice picking up momentum as the tension coils tighter in her delivery. It’s moody, striking and teetering on the edge of control, with a deep undercurrent of angst that hovers just above a scream. The bubble threatens to burst, but it never does. And that restraint is intentional.

Keep ReadingShow less
Reality TV Is Turning Us Into Armchair Psychologists
Illustration by Mark Paez

At the height of Love Island USA season 7, new episodes were only half the entertainment. As each one aired, the fun came with recapping, discussing and dissecting the Islanders’ every move on social media. But that conversation quickly went south, as some viewers began diagnosing contestants like Huda Mustafa with borderline personality disorder (BPD). As Mustafa’s relationship with Jeremiah Brown shifted from lovey-dovey moments to screaming call-outs, more and more people piled on with amateur commentary. And in the era of armchair psychology, Love Island contestants aren't the only reality stars under this kind of scrutiny.

With social media breeding a new kind of fan culture around surveillance-based reality shows like Love Is Blind, Big Brother, The Ultimatum and Love Island, a different entertainment experience has emerged. Audiences don’t just watch people on reality shows anymore; they try to diagnose them.

Keep ReadingShow less
ChatGPT Psychosis in the Age of AI Companionship
Illustration by Mark Paez

It often starts innocently enough, with late-night chats about philosophy, deep dives into simulation theory or musings on the nature of consciousness. But for a small number of users, these exchanges with AI chatbots can take a darker turn. As tools like ChatGPT become more embedded into everyday life, mental health professionals are sounding the alarm about a rare but troubling new phenomenon. It's what some are now calling "ChatGPT psychosis," where AI interaction may intensify or trigger psychotic symptoms.

While there’s still no official diagnosis and the evidence remains anecdotal, these kinds of stories continue to pop up across the internet. On Reddit, users are sharing accounts of loved ones experiencing AI-associated delusions, often involving spiritual and supernatural fantasies. On X, prominent tech VC Geoff Lewis claims that he’s “the primary target of a non-governmental system,” beliefs that echo narratives commonly seen in persecutory delusions. Lewis stated that conversations with AI helped him uncover or “map” this supposed conspiracy, though it's unclear whether these beliefs preceded or followed his AI interactions.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Labubu as an Anti-Fashion Statement
Illustration by Mark Paez/Photos via Shutterstock

A couple of years ago, the Labubu was practically a secret. With its pointy ears and sharp-toothed grin, the Pop Mart plushie was an IYKYK obsession among fashion insiders, spotted on Birkin bags and in the front row of shows. It signaled a niche kind of cool, a playful rebellion against the seriousness of high fashion. It said, “I’m young, irreverent and fun.” And for a while, that’s exactly what it was.

Then came the boom.

Keep ReadingShow less